Today I will have back your tests and we will talk about MLA FORMAT.
Monday, February 28, 2022
Friday, February 25, 2022
Thursday, February 24, 2022
Thursday
We are going to continue to take notes on persuasion, but make sure you know:
1) Logos
2) Ethos
3) Pathos
and types of persuasive elements needed in an essays
1) Personal Connection
2) Expect Testimony
3) Stats, Facts, quality of reasoning
4) Counter argument
5) Audience self-interest (Harms or Benefits of solution)
6) New topic or radical twist on an old topic
Wednesday, February 23, 2022
Oration/Persuation
Oratory
Objectives (smaller chunks of overall goal) and suggested time periods
OBJECTIVES: By the end of this unit students will be able to
|
|
4
|
3
|
2
|
Not Evident
|
|
Thesis Statement, Ideas,
Defining your argument
|
Ideas are fresh and
original. Thesis is narrow and manageable.
Order of development clear and precise and helps development one clear main
idea. Hook and thesis connect. Clear important details for support
|
Ideas are clear but might
be overused. Topic/ Thesis is fairly
board. Order of develop may ramble and
may not back up thesis. Hook is present
but may not connect with thesis.
Support is attempted but not quite fulfilled with specifics.
|
Paper lacks a central idea
or purpose. Ideas are not developed or
seem to go in several directions.
Information is limited or unclear.
Details are missing.
|
Not Evident
|
|
Organization
|
Original title.
Transitions connect main
ideas. Effective opening and ending.
Easy to follow. Important ideas
stand out. Clear beginning, middle and
end. Details fit where placed.
|
Appropriate title. Transitions connect sentence to sentence
but not necessary idea to idea. Good
beginning. Attempted ending. Logical sequencing. Key ideas are beginning to surface. Readable.
|
Paper is hard to follow
because transitions are weak or absent.
There is no clear beginning or ending.
Ideas may not fit together or ramble.
Paragraph structure might not be evident.
|
Not Evident
|
|
Voice
|
Point of view is evident
Clear sense of audience
Enthusiastic about
topic. Says more than is
expected. Words elicit both ideas and
emotions. Work is engaging and
persuades
|
Personal treatment of
standard topic. Perspective becomes
evident. Some sense of audience. Conveys ideas to reader. The writer likes the topic, but is not
passionate about it. Writing persuades
in some places
|
Paper is lifeless,
mechanic, stilted. Predictable
treatment of topic. Energy
lacking. Audience could be anyone. Writer is indifferent to the topic. Does not persuade at all.
|
Not evident
|
|
Word Choice
|
Precise, fresh, original
words. Vivid images. Avoids repetitions, clichés, and
vagueness. Use of figurative language. Everyday words are used well.
|
Uses favorite words
correctly. Experiments with new
words. Attempts to use descriptive
words to create images.
|
Ordinary and recognizable
words. Language is generic or
cliché. Uses repetitions or relies on
slang. Overuse of “to be” verbs.
|
Not Evident
|
|
Sentence Fluency
|
Consistent use of sentence
variety. Sentence structure is correct
and creative. Varied beginnings,
varied structures, and varied lengths.
Natural flow and rhythm.
Writing is not wordy. Rhetorical strategies such as parallelism used effectively.
|
Sentences are usually
correct, but some may not flow smoothly.
Simple and compound sentences are present. Varied beginning. Sections have rhythm and flow. Writing could be cut to avoid wordiness.
Rhetorical strategies such as parallelism attempted.
|
Sentences are choppy,
incomplete, rambling or awkward.
Meanings are not always clear.
Words are strung together.
Sentences could be extremely wordy.
|
Not Evident
|
|
Mechanics
|
There may be occasional
errors in mechanics (spelling, fragments, run-ons, punctuation,
capitalization, usage, etc.). However,
it is hard to find errors.
|
Errors in writing mechanics
are noticeable but do not impair readability.
|
Numerous errors in usage,
grammar, spelling, capitalization, and/or punctuation distract reader and
impair readability.
|
Not Evident
|
|
Uses of Persuasive
Tools/Evidence
Expert Testimony
Personal Connection
Statistics, Facts, and
Logic
Counter Argument (Counter
claims)
Audience Self-Interest
|
Essay
cites at least two experts in a field related to the topic. Evidence is relevant to thesis. Analysis makes clear how the evidence
connects to the thesis. (Ethos and
Logos)
Student
uses personal experience to connect to the topic (ethos). Experience is relevant and analyzed in
relation to the topic.
Student uses statistics,
facts, and logical argumentation in essay.
The evidence is relevant to the thesis. Analysis makes clear how the evidence
connects and defends the thesis. (Logos)
Student has at least two
counter arguments that refutes or contends an argument of the opposition, or
concedes a point. The counterarguments
are relevant, analyzed and connect evidence with thesis.
(Logos and Ethos)
Student uses HARMS and
BENEFITS of adopting his/her position to influence audience self-interest
(Pathos). The harms/benefits are
relevant and reinforce the thesis.
|
Essay cites at least two
experts. Evidence is relevant to
thesis. The analysis makes some
connections between evidence and thesis.
Student
uses personal experience relevant to the topic. Experience offers some insight into the
topic and position of the writer.
Student uses statistics
and/or facts and/or logical argumentation in the essay. The evidence is relevant to the
thesis. The analysis makes some
connections between evidence and thesis.
Student has at least one
counter argument that refutes or concedes an argument of the opposition. The counterargument is relevant, and
analyze.
Student uses HARMS or
BENEFITS of adopting his/her or her position to influence audience
self-interest. The harm or benefit is
relevant and might connect to the thesis.
|
Essay cites at least one
expert. Evidence might not be relevant
to thesis. No analysis or no
connection made between evidence and thesis
Student
attempts to use personal connection.
Connection may not be relevant to the topic.
Student attempts to use
statistics and/or facts. Evidence may
not be relevant to thesis or the analysis is confusing or oversimplified.
Student attempts a counter
argument. The counter argument might
not be relevant to the thesis or the analysis might be confusing or
oversimplified.
Student attempts to use
HARMS or BENEFITS to influence audience.
The harm or benefit might not be relevant or the analysis might be
confusing or oversimplified.
.
|
Not Evident
Not Evident
Not Evident
Not Evident
Not Evident
|
|
References and Sources
|
More
than five sources. All sources of
information are noted in correct in-text citation (MLA format) and correct
Works Cited page.
|
Three
to five sources. Some sources of information are noted incorrectly or not in
MLA format. Minor problems with Works
Cited page.
|
Less than three
sources. Most information noted
incorrectly. MLA format completely
missing. Many problems with Works
Cited page.
|
Not Evident
|
*Transition into summary of key points
(a prediction), a call to action (a recommendation) or a scare
(a veiled threat)
Incorporate transitions
Use high-level vocab
Create a strong “voice”
Tuesday, February 22, 2022
Tuesday
Today will be your last day to work on your essays in class. They will be due on Thursday.
Please let me know if you have questions or concerns and please share what you have with me.
FOCUS
(Claims, set-up)
|
Hook, Thesis Statement, Order of development connects to
an n overarching idea of the novel.
Thesis is manageable. Hook and
thesis are connected by idea. Hook is
witty or insightful.
|
Hook, Thesis Statement are present in the first paragraph
Hook and thesis are connected by idea.
Order of development is present.
|
There is a thesis statement but either it is not clear, or
the order of development and/or hook is missing.
|
No thesis statement
|
Examples and Analysis
|
At least five pieces of evidence from novel. Evidence is either direct quotation or
paraphrases with page # citation.
Commentary explains relationship between evidence and thesis.
|
4-5 pieces of evidence.
Evidence is either direct quotations or paraphrases with page #
citation. Provides commentary on
evidence; however commentary.
Relationship between evidence and thesis may not be thoroughly
developed.
|
3-4 pieces of evidence.
Evidence maybe mere summary w/o connection to the thesis. Or there are vague references to the
text. References could be vaguely
relevant to thesis. Little or no
commentary (analysis).
|
No Analysis or examples or examples are unclear. Repeats information already provide or
simply restates the thesis as evidence.
|
Sophistication of Writing
|
Point of view is evident.
Clear sense of audience. Ideas
are original. Work is engaging. Precise, fresh and original words. Sentence
variety. Effective use of rhetorical
devices such as parallelism or figurative language.
|
A sense of audience.
Conveys ideas to reader. Use of
rhetorical devices. Engaging
vocabulary.
|
Paper lacks energy.
Essay lacks focus and/or doesn’t persuade. Language relies on repetition of the same
words or there is an overuse of “to be” verbs.
|
Voice is not apparent, or doesn’t necessary seem that of
the author.
|
Mechanics
|
One to three small mistakes
|
Three to five small mistakes that do not affect the
reading of the essay
|
Five to ten mistakes
|
Numerous mistakes that impair reading
|
Thursday, February 17, 2022
Wednesday, February 16, 2022
Wednesday
Today you need to begin to write an analytical essay on some motif in Macbeth. You will need to choose a motif - such as birds - and connect it to a major theme (this should be your thesis) and then discuss how this motif in developed in the play. You will need evidence from the text. Please send me your thesis statements as you get them written so I can check them and let you know if they work.
Unit Learning goal: At the end of this Unit students will be able to
analysis a motif found in Macbeth, create a thesis, and connect the
motif to the meaning of the play as a whole by writing a short 2-3 page essay.
Scale/Rubric relating to learning goal:
4 – The student is able to combine more than one motif into a thesis
statement, and answer it by evaluating the text and using specifics to
back up his/her position.
3 – The student can choose a motif, develop it into a thesis statement,
and analyze the text using specific evidence to back up their position.
2 – With some direction/help from the teacher the student can choose a
motif, develop it into a thesis statement, and analyze the text using
specific evidence to back up their position.
1 – Even with help from the teacher the student is unable to choose a
motif, or develop it into a thesis statement, and analyze the text using
specific evidence to back up their position.
MOTIF and THEMES IN Macbeth
• Motifs
--washing of hands
--blood
--planting of seeds, things growing
--the atmosphere of Macbeth’s castle
--spells or chants and supernatural beings
--weather
--daggers
--spirits, scorpions, snakes and things in the mind
--birds and flying:
• THEMES:
--Blind Ambition
--The Corruption of Power
--Appearance vs. Reality
--Superstition and how it affects human behavior
--Good vs. Evil
Friday
Today we are going to discuss in-text citations and continue with writing essays. Please remember that a draft of your essay is due by t...
-
Presentations - TOMORROW Oedipus Rex Prologue: A monologue or dialogue preceding the entry of the chorus, which presents the tra...
-
ORAL RUBRIC Criteria Exceeds Standard (4) Meets Standard (3) Needs Im...
-
Today we are going to look at a "Syntax Primer" and then begin reading "Everyday Use". First we need to write sentences...